Thursday, December 19, 2013

Preacher's Study - Christmas, 2013

The Preacher’s Study
First thoughts about Christmas sermons

Frank Logue


The difficulty of preaching Christmas, of course, is that the story is familiar and yet we do want to stick to the story. So as I look at the familiar story of the Incarnation as found in Luke 2, I notice anew how the announcement comes from unreliable sources.

Shepherds were regarded, along with tax collectors and some other occupations, as little better than thieves. Due to the dry conditions of the land, shepherds had to range widely with the flocks entrusted to them. Well away from the owners of the herd, who could know how many lambs were born in a given year? It was not uncommon for shepherds to sell off some lambs and pocket the money. 

The ancient Jewish rabbis considered shepherding a thieving occupation and deprived shepherds of some civil rights. For example, shepherds were not permitted to appear in court as a witness as they were considered so unreliable. Shepherds were assumed to be such liars that their testimony would not hold up in court no matter how many shepherds told the story. Later, Jesus great witness to the resurrection will be Mary Magdalene, and while she will be an apostle to the apostles, her testimony would likewise not be accepted in court due to her gender. This seems wrapped up to me in what God is doing through the Incarnation to turn the way of the world upside down.

It was pure foolishness to give the good news to end all good news to groups that everyone would consider suspect. As Paul would later write to the Corinthians, “God’s foolishness is wiser than human wisdom and God’s weakness is stronger than human strength” (1 Corinthians 1:25). The very commonness, lowliness really, of Jesus’ birth is confirmed when the angels appear neither at the stable with Mary, Joseph and Jesus, nor in the palace of Caesar or even Herod. The very people no one would believe were given the news everyone should hear. 

Then there is the sign that the shepherds are given. They will know the angels' message is true when they find "a child wrapped in bands of cloth and lying in a manger." Basically, the message is that when you find a parent so down on their luck as to use a feed box for a bassinet, you will have found the Messiah.

Yet this comes as good news of great joy for all people, for how much more could God turn the world upside down in a single night than coming to the world not in power, but in weakness; not in wealth, but in poverty; and not to the esteemed, but to those no one else would notice. As I journey toward Christmas, I wonder how I can help show anew just how revolutionary the Incarnation was and is. For whatever else would follow that night, it could no longer be the status quo.



Frank Logue is a member of the APLM Council having served previously as its secretary. He is the Canon to the Ordinary of the Diocese of Georgia and blogs on congregational development at http://loosecanon.georgiaepiscopal.org


The photo shows steps in Capernaum Israel that may miss the point of the Incarnation as any place can and be made holy.

Monday, December 16, 2013

Preacher's Study - Year A, Advent 4, 2013


The Preacher’s Study
First thoughts about next Sunday’s sermon,
Advent IV (or Advent VII, expanded season)

Frank Logue


Our Gospel reading for today is Matthew’s account of Jesus’ birth, up until the birth itself. In this reading, we are introduced to Joseph, the earthly stepfather of God’s son Jesus. Joseph is kept so busy following God’s dreams in Matthew’s Gospel that he has been called the errand boy of the Incarnation.

A betrothal in first century Judaism was a formal contract. Girls were betrothed typically at the age of twelve to twelve and a half years old. They would not go live with their husband, but they would be committed to them at that point. 

Breaking the engagement took a divorce decree. Divorce could be written by either party and witnessed by three others to be legal. Adultery was also grounds for divorce. Adultery during the engagement, just as in marriage, was punishable by death according to the Jewish law. While public humiliation was often the only punishment meted out, Jesus will later defend a woman caught in adultery, saving her life from a crowd intent on stoning her. Jesus own mother, Mary, could have likewise been killed for the crime of adultery had Joseph pursued justice.

I notice three sets of plans. Plan A for Joseph was to marry Mary. During the engagement, Joseph learns that Mary is pregnant and he knows that he is not the child’s father. Now comes Plan B, which is for Joseph is to quietly make some arrangements to break off the engagement without Mary facing an angry mob. Then God intervenes with Plan C. An angel appears to Joseph in a dream to assure Joseph that this was God’s plan all along.

In God’s plan, Joseph will take on the minor public dishonor of having everyone assume the child that would otherwise be born out of wedlock is his own. Joseph marries Mary. She has a child who Joseph names Jesus, which means “God saves.”

God will save and God will do it through Jesus. But Joseph and Mary were essential to the plan. Mary had to consent to the pregnancy and Joseph to the marriage. It wasn’t their Plan A or Plan B. But it was God’s plan all along.

I think there is a reason this pattern repeats itself. We have our own desires, our own plans and dreams. Then life throws things at us we never planned, a pregnancy, a sickness. Who knows what it has been or will be for you? But somewhere along the line, you start looking for another option. Like Joseph who decides God’s will must be to put Mary away quietly, you don’t always ask God’s opinion in making plans for life. But God is still there. For me in a small and unimportant way and for Joseph in history changing way, getting our own plans out of the way can help God to lead us to the life he had for us all along.

If Plan A is my plan and Plan B is my quick knee-jerk reaction to my plan not working out, then how do I get to God's plan, Plan C? For me, I see God's plan only when I begin the harder work of spiritual discernment. This week as I journey toward Sunday, I am wondering about how I am holding on to my own dreams, and what must I set aside to get to neither my plans nor reactions, but God's will.



Frank Logue is a member of the APLM Council having served previously as its secretary. He is the Canon to the Ordinary of the Diocese of Georgia and blogs on congregational development at http://loosecanon.georgiaepiscopal.org

The photo of three Camels ranging free in Mahktesh Hagadol Israel illustrates plans A through C lined up.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Preacher's Study - Year A, Advent 3, 2013


The Preacher’s Study
First thoughts about next Sunday’s sermon,
Advent III (or Advent VI, expanded season)

Frank Logue


John the Baptist flip-flopped. Jesus' ministry didn’t exactly get off to the incendiary start and by the time he has landed in Herod's dungeon, the wild and wooly baptizer is wondering if he saw things rightly on Jordan's banks. Jesus sends back John's messengers with the evidence of the Kingdom of God in "the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the poor have good news brought to them."

In the 16th century, Thomas of Villanova  (1486-1555) connected each of Jesus statements to prophecy found in Isaiah. Isaiah wrote, “Then shall the eyes of the blind be opened, and the ears of the deaf unsealed and the lame man will leap like a hart.” 

Jesus said, “the blind receive their sight, the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead are raised.”

Isaiah also wrote, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon me . . . he has sent me to announce good tidings to the poor.” 

Jesus said, “the poor have good news brought to them.” 

Finally, Isaiah wrote, “He will be a stone for stumbling over, and a rock of scandal as well, for both houses of Israel.” 

Jesus said, “Blessed is anyone who takes no offense at me.” (Isaiah’s prophecies in Isaiah 35, 29, and 61 in Forty Gospel Homilies: PL 76, 1077)

Jesus connects his own ministry to the prophecies about the one who is to come. Jesus offered his miracles as a sign that God was working through him in the way that had been prophesied.

The point for Matthew in putting this story in his Gospel probably had nothing to do with John the Baptist and everything to do with you. For by the time Matthew wrote his Gospel, John the Baptist had been dead for decades. It no longer mattered what John knew and when he knew it. What mattered most is you, the reader.

Matthew begs the question, “Is Jesus the One who was to come or are we to wait for another?” We know that Matthew wrote for Jewish readers and so he gives the reader pause to consider whether what they read about Jesus is what the Old Testament told us to expect of the Messiah. But Jew or Gentile, the question for any of us is, “Is Jesus the One or do we go searching for another?”

God may never come into your life exactly as you expect. That’s what happened to John the Baptist. John knew Jesus was the Messiah the day of Jesus’ baptism because of the promptings of the Holy Spirit. But the Spirit did not control John’s every waking thought and John came to doubt. John had a box labeled “Messiah” and the real Messiah didn’t measure up to John’s expectations. 

As I journey toward Sunday, I note that we have the same problem as John. Jesus still doesn’t meet our expectations. John preached straighten up right now because the Messiah is coming to bring the smack down. Then Jesus came and did far less than John anticipated. Our problem is more likely the opposite of John the Baptist’s problem. John expected much more of the Messiah. We often expect little or nothing.

I pray for miracles and then make up excuses for God in advance. After all, God is not a cosmic vending machine dispensing answers to prayer on demand. That’s OK as long as what I am really seeking is God’s will, and know that my prayers might not be God’s will. But it’s not OK to make excuses for why God won’t come through if all I am doing is playing it safe, hedging my bets, because I don’t have the faith that God will act on my prayers. I continually remind myself to be open to the real miracles, and when I can keep my heart and mind open, wonderful things can and do happen. 

The problem is boxing in God. Jesus’ ministry was so much more than John the Baptist appreciated from his prison cell. Jesus was patiently, lovingly, turning the world upside down one life at a time. 

Jesus is so much more than our preconceived notions too. Whatever box you or I have put him in, it’s too small, because Jesus is still transforming the world in unexpected ways. I am wondering how I can help hearers this Sunday to smash the box into which they have placed our Trinitarian God. How might we let go of our too strict notions and our too little hopes of Jesus? This is what I am pondering as I journey toward Sunday.


Frank Logue is a member of the APLM Council, having served previously as its secretary. He is the Canon to the Ordinary of the Diocese of Georgia and blogs on congregational development at http://loosecanon.georgiaepiscopal.org


The image of bulrushes near Banias (Caesarea Philippi) was taken by Frank Logue. These are the reeds shaken by the wind Jesus asked if people went out to see.

Monday, December 2, 2013

Preacher's Study - Year A, Advent 2, 2013


The Preacher’s Study
First thoughts about next Sunday’s sermon,
Advent II (or Advent V, expanded season)

Frank Logue


John is a wild man on the margins of society who refuses to be tamed. John came to the right time and place as anyone dressed like a wild man, shouting words of God’s coming judgment to anyone who would listen, would land themselves in a mental hospital if not a jail these days.


It seems almost preposterous to think that the actions of a single person could make even the slightest difference in the great sweep of human history. But if we pause to think about it for a moment, it seems as if a single person making the right stand at the right time has done more to change history than all the mobs that have ever taken to the streets. 

Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat on a Montgomery City Bus. Mahatma Ghandi leading by non-violent example when all India seemed ready to erupt in a blood bath. And, on the edge of Tienamen Square a lone Chinese dissident halted a column of tanks by sheer will and personal courage. The Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial. Archbishop Desmond Tutu having to shout words of peace to an angry mob in a South African township. 

The Jewish Historian Josephus gives us an account of John the Baptist that both agrees with and fills out the picture we get in the four Gospels and Acts. Josephus describes John as a good man who exhorted the Jews to live righteous lives. Josephus says John taught the Jews to “practice justice toward their fellows and piety toward God and in so doing to join in baptism.” In this John was no innovator. The message was essentially the same “Love God and love your neighbor as yourself” written in the Old Testament and destined to be preached by Jesus and his disciples.

Look in our reading for this coming Sunday how the Pharisees and Sadducees, two of the key sects within the Jewish faith came out to John. He could have greeted them warmly, thankful that some of the religious movers and shakers of the day were seeing things his way. Instead, John blasted them “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come?”


I won’t be trying that method this Sunday. But there is something enduring in John’s approach for those of us with a robust view of baptism. In our Gospel reading for this morning he says, “Bear fruit worthy of repentance.” Repentance means saying that you are sorry for the things you have been doing wrong, the sins in your life. But repentance also means stopping doing the things you know are wrong and starting to do the things you know are right. To bear fruit worthy of that repentance meant to act like someone who had changed. If you left the banks of the Jordan soaking wet, but unchanged then John would say that his baptism had been for nothing. John knew that a more lasting, more affecting baptism was coming with the Messiah, but in the meantime, John was counting on real life change on the part of those he baptized.

In one sense, John is still out there in the wilderness. Christianity never did tame John the forerunner. In fact, the Bible is unashamed to note that while John pointed to Jesus as the Messiah, he never became a disciple of Jesus himself. In the sermon next Sunday, we will continue a two-week look at John the Baptist as we see ways in which John later wondered about his own predictions of the Messiah. But this Sunday, we are left on Jordan’s banks, watching and waiting.

As I pray my way toward Sunday, I want to be captured by John’s words as they haunted the people who were driven out in the desert to hear him for themselves: “Bear fruit worthy of repentance!”


No, we cannot earn our way to heaven by mending our ways. But, yes John’s message is still true.  If we want to avoid the scorching heat of his blast against the Pharisees and Sadducees as a Brood of Vipers then we should ponder if our lives are changed in any way because we are Christians. What would fruit worthy of repentance look like in our time? In our lives?



Frank Logue is a member of the APLM Council having served previously as its secretary. He is the Canon to the Ordinary of the Diocese of Georgia and blogs on congregational development at http://loosecanon.georgiaepiscopal.org

Photos by Frank Logue. To go with the voice crying from the wilderness, Frank prefers the wild places of Israel over the Jordan River. These three photos are from a trip he took in 2000. ‘Olive tree’ and ‘Poppy’ are while he hiked with his wife and daughter from the Mediterranean to the Sea of Galilee. ‘Oasis’ is taken at Ein Gedi near the Dead Sea.